O‘QUVCHILARNI KASBGA YO‘NALTIRISH TIZIMINI STRATEGIK BOSHQARISH SAMARADORLIGINI BAHOLASH MEZONLARI VA TAJRIBA-SINOV NATIJALARINI TAHLIL QILISH METODIKASI
Keywords:
kasbga yo‘naltirish, strategik boshqaruv, baholash mezonlari, ta’lim sifati, monitoring, tajriba-sinov, tahlil birligi, ta’sir hajmi, qayta aloqa.Abstract
Tezisda umumiy o‘rta ta’lim maktablarida kasbga yo‘naltirishni strategik boshqarish samaradorligini baholashning nazariy-metodik yechimi taklif etiladi. Tadqiqot maqsadi kasbiy yo‘nalganlik, boshqaruv-tashkiliy hamkorlik, mehnat bozori bilan muvofiqlik va natijaviylik mezonlarini o‘lchanadigan indikatorlar hamda dalil manbalari bilan bog‘lashdan iborat. Qiyosiy-konseptual tahlil va metodik loyihalash orqali o‘quvchi, maktab va hamkorlik darajalaridagi ko‘rsatkichlar farqlandi. M.U. Axmedovning ta’lim sifati, monitoring va strategik rahbarlikka oid ishlari xalqaro baholash yondashuvlari bilan qiyoslandi. Natija sifatida mezonlar matritsasi, ma’lumotlarni tekshirish tartibi va tahlildan boshqaruv qaroriga o‘tish algoritmi ishlab chiqildi. Boshlang‘ich–yakuniy hamda tajriba–nazorat taqqoslashlarining metodik chegaralari ko‘rsatildi. Tasdiqlangan birlamchi ma’lumotlar mavjud bo‘lmagani sababli empirik samaradorlik, foizlar va statistik ahamiyatlilik haqida xulosa chiqarilmadi.
References
1. OECD. The State of Global Teenage Career Preparation. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025. 62 p. DOI: 10.1787/d5f8e3f2-en. Elektron manba
2. Ахмедов М.У. Качество среднего образования как педагогическая проблема // Образование и инновационные исследования. 2023. № 10. С. 89–92. Elektron manba
3. Ахмедов М.У. Халқ таълими тизимида таълим сифати мониторингини амалиётга жорий этиш технологияси // Ta’lim va innovatsion tadqiqotlar. 2023. № 5. B. 118–123. Elektron manba
4. Ahmedov M.U. Managing educational quality in secondary schools in Uzbekistan: Evidence-based policies and strategic leadership // Iqtisod, menejment va pul. 2025. № 2. P. 4–19. Elektron manba
5. Hooley T., Rice S. Ensuring quality in career guidance: a critical review // British Journal of Guidance & Counselling. 2019. Vol. 47, No. 4. P. 472–486. DOI: 10.1080/03069885.2018.1480012. Elektron manba
6. American Educational Research Association; American Psychological Association; National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: AERA, 2014. Elektron manba
7. What Works Clearinghouse. Study Review Protocol. Version 5.1. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, 2025. 18 p. Elektron manba
8. Gertler P.J., Martinez S., Premand P., Rawlings L.B., Vermeersch C.M.J. Impact Evaluation in Practice. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank and World Bank, 2016. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0779-4. Elektron manba
9. Wasserstein R.L., Lazar N.A. The ASA’s Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose // The American Statistician. 2016. Vol. 70, No. 2. P. 129–133. DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108. Elektron manba
10. Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs // Frontiers in Psychology. 2013. Vol. 4. Article 863. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863. Elektron manba
11. Moore G.F., Audrey S., Barker M. et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance // BMJ. 2015. Vol. 350. h1258. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. Elektron manba
12. Hofer A.-R., Zhivkovikj A., Smyth R. The role of labour market information in guiding educational and occupational choices // OECD Education Working Papers. 2020. No. 229. 58 p. DOI: 10.1787/59bbac06-en. Elektron manba
13. Schildkamp K., Lai M.K., Earl L. (eds.). Data-based Decision Making in Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3. Elektron manba
